What God?

Most of the time when I meet someone who doesn't believe in God, I find that I don't believe in the God they don't believe in either.

There are a lot of different ideas about God.

The Judeo-Christian concept of God is probably the single most complex concept that the human mind has ever attempted. It is also very poorly understood by a large percentage of Christians. Fortunately, one doesn't have to have a very deep understanding of the concept of God to be a Christian. Even a simplistic, child like understanding can be sufficient. But while simple conceptions of God can be sufficient, they are not the whole story.

This page gives some details about the Judeo-Christian concept of God. Some of it is pretty heavy theological crap and may not be for everybody.

Back to New Reformation Home Page

Some God's (and Other Stuff) I Don't Believe In.

Here are some things you don't have to believe in, just because you are a Christian. I am a scientist and I don't have to give up the scientific perspective to be a Christian. For example, I am a Christian and I believe in evolution. I just don't believe that the direction that evolution is following is an accident.

Two Topics: Revelation and the Nature of God

Ok, now to the main ideas of this page. There are two concepts to be covered, First we deal with the issue of where the knowledge comes from, the method, then with what we have discovered using the method.

From this perspective, revelation is a method, not unlike the scientific method, for finding out about God.

How Do We Know About God?

There are several principles underlying revelation.

God is as God does.

In the Judeo-Christian tradition, humans figure out who God is and what God is like, by watching what God does. The primary source for information about God is interpretations of God's action in history. That is why the Bible is primarily a history book. The ancient Jews believed that if you wanted to know God, all you had to do is look at the history of what God had done for and to his people. Most of the "revelations" in the Bible of the nature of God are utterances of individuals who are interpreting history. They are inspired interpretations of historical events.

The idea that we find out who God is from what God does was originated by the ancient Jewish scholars. It was the method adopted by Christ's followers (who were mostly Jews, educated in Jewish ways). As a result, the most important thing about Christ is not what he said but what he did. Christ died for us. It is this interpretation given to the historical events which occurred in Christ's life that makes Christ the ultimate revelation of God.

As the Artist's Personality is Reflected in His/Her Art, So God is Reflected in God's Creations.

Since one of the things God does is create, we can sometimes (at least indirectly) figure out God's intentions by looking at what he made. As a result, Jews and Christians believe that God can be revealed in nature. For this reason, the study of nature has always been a lofty and desirable activity in Jewish and Christian cultures. In cultures and civilizations dominated by religions that hold that god is part of nature, tampering with nature has frequently been seen as dangerous. If you mess with nature (which is god) you may anger the gods. In the Judeo-Christian tradition no such taboo has existed. As a result it is primarily in western civilization that science emerged.

An example may help clarify the complexity and depth of this approach which goes well beyond simple wonder and awe at the beauty of nature. One of the laws of nature which reveals God's intentions is the law of the survival of the fittest. That this law is part of nature is consistent with the idea that history has a direction (and therefore a purpose) and can be taken as a starting point of a search for an understanding of the purpose, (ie: a search for God).

History is the criterion against which revelations must be judged and revelation is the criterion against which interpretations of history must be judged.

All this results in a mutual interdependence of historical interpretation and revelation. Historical interpretations are correct if they are consistent with the revealed nature of God. Putative revelations can be accepted as legitimate if they are consistent with what God has been doing in history. This dynamic (dialectic) interaction between history and revelation results in a phenomenally complex process that can easily surpass the capacity of the human intellect.

Anybody can say "The Lord has revealed to me thus-and-so." How do you know who to believe. Only this way. We must ask, "Is this supposed revelation consistent with what be know about God?" Unfortunately, it is often very difficult to tell. Sometimes it takes generations or even centuries before history reveals who was right in a particular controversy.

For example, some of our forefathers believed that slavery was OK. They argued, presumably thoughtfully and sincerely, that slavery was ordained of God on the basis of a particular interpretation of scripture. Time has led us to see the errors in their understanding. Similarly, the church faces a number of difficult issues today. When we look back on these issues from the perspective of 150 years in the future, the answers to these issues may be much clearer as well.

God continues to be revealed in history today as since the beginning of time.

As long as history continues, we will continue to see God in action. As long as God is in action, we can continue to learn about the nature of God. Revelation did not end at some time in the past, it continues today as we see the events of history and interpret them in terms of what we know about God. Unfortunately humans may not know the meaning of historical events until years, decades, or centuries after they have occurred.

The interpretation is as important as the historical facts.

A number of years ago, there was a popular theological movement which focused on a search for the historical Jesus. Of course, the real Jesus is the foundation of our faith, and history is the foundation of revelation. It follows that the more we know about history, the more we can learn about God. However, it is not just history; it is the interpretation that is most important and while you can't just make up history (although the church has tried to do this a number of times to support particular positions), the un-interpreted facts have little value.

The concepts and ideas derived from interpretations of history, however, can come to have a world changing impact and a life of their own, separate from the history. A story comes to mind concerning the great theologian Paul Tillich, who maintained that Christianity would not be undermined if it could be shown that the historical Jesus never lived. Tillich's students used to joke that if Tillich had heard that an archeologist had proved that Jesus never rose from the dead because he had found the bones of Jesus, Tillich would have exclaimed: "He really did live?" (Moody, D. (1981) The Word Of Truth, Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, MI, page 32).

What Do We Know About God, So Far?

The following are basic tenets of orthodox theology which have come to be more or less agreed on by great scholars and thinkers over the centuries. BACK


Send comments to:
Steve Falkenberg

Steve.Falkenberg@eku.edu

Copyright © 1998 Steve Falkenberg